Exploring the Benefits and Risks of Lotus Birth

Lotus birth is a practice of leaving the umbilical cord and placenta attached to the newborn until the cord falls off on its own.

Delayed Clamping vs. Lotus Birth: What’s the Difference?

Delayed umbilical cord clamping is an alternative to lotus birth, as it allows for the cord to remain attached for a few minutes after the baby’s arrival.

History of Lotus Birth

Lotus birth is a process that has been practiced for centuries in many cultures, as it is rooted in ancient medicinal practices of Asian and African cultures.

The Rise of Lotus Birth in the Western World

Lotus birth is becoming increasingly popular in the West as parents choose to delay cord clamping and keep the umbilical cord attached to the baby after birth.

What Does the Research Say?

Although lotus birth has been practiced for centuries, no quality research currently supports its alleged benefits for the baby.

Delayed Cord Clamping vs. Lotus Births

Delayed cord clamping, or leaving the umbilical cord uncut for 1-3 minutes after the baby’s arrival, is now supported by many health organizations.

Benefits of Lotus Birth

Like delayed cor clamping, lotus births are believed to improve immune function, increase iron, and reduce the risk of anemia and other common newborn ailments.

Risks of Lotus Birth

One of the most significant risks involves the umbilical cord and placenta, which remain attached to the baby until after delivery and can become colonized by bacteria and potentially become infected.

Although the practice of lotus birth is not generally accepted or taught by healthcare professionals, it has a rich history dating back centuries and is gaining popularity in some natural birthing circles.